K. Reed

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Questions?

Ta-Nehisi Coats on Writing and Writing for Free

I’ve blogged about writing and compensation before here and here. Mostly I just love that this is a debate. I love that it’s ongoing. I love that people I love are writing about it.

I don’t know what they get paid to do so.

    • #writing
    • #publishing
    • #economics
  • 2 months ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
It’s been three years since VidaWeb published its remarkably damning assessment of the representation of women (as both authors and reviewers) in literary magazines in 2010.
They’ve updated it now, and it’s surprising how little has changed.
You can see the original 2010 summary here.
The 2013 update has data for 2010, 2011, and 2012. 
Here are the real offenders, whose subscriptions I will (or would) be canceling:
The Times Literary SupplementThe Threepenny ReviewThe Paris Review The New YorkerThe New York Review of BooksThe New RepublicThe London Review of Books
Edit: I just unfollowed The Paris Review and The New Yorker. It was painful.
Zoom Info
It’s been three years since VidaWeb published its remarkably damning assessment of the representation of women (as both authors and reviewers) in literary magazines in 2010.
They’ve updated it now, and it’s surprising how little has changed.
You can see the original 2010 summary here.
The 2013 update has data for 2010, 2011, and 2012. 
Here are the real offenders, whose subscriptions I will (or would) be canceling:
The Times Literary SupplementThe Threepenny ReviewThe Paris Review The New YorkerThe New York Review of BooksThe New RepublicThe London Review of Books
Edit: I just unfollowed The Paris Review and The New Yorker. It was painful.
Zoom Info

It’s been three years since VidaWeb published its remarkably damning assessment of the representation of women (as both authors and reviewers) in literary magazines in 2010.

They’ve updated it now, and it’s surprising how little has changed.

You can see the original 2010 summary here.

The 2013 update has data for 2010, 2011, and 2012. 

Here are the real offenders, whose subscriptions I will (or would) be canceling:

The Times Literary Supplement
The Threepenny Review
The Paris Review 
The New Yorker
The New York Review of Books
The New Republic
The London Review of Books

Edit: I just unfollowed The Paris Review and The New Yorker. It was painful.

    • #publishing
    • #academic publishing
  • 2 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Writing and Compensation

I follow John Scalzi at Whatever because he is great, and there you have it. He has two posts that are really distressing me: 

“A Note to You, Should You be Thinking of Asking Me to Write for You for Free”

and 

”A Little More Re: Writing for Free”

and while we’re at it, here is Neil Gaiman’s 

“Advice for Novice Writers”

I agree whole-heartedly with Scalzi and Gaiman. Writing is a valuable public good, and writers should be compensated for their work.

What distresses me is this: why aren’t I following their advice? My entire industry is built on free (and in my estimation, copyright abusive) publication, with the anticipation of indirect reward (tenure, raises, etc., for publication). I’m not, however, seeking tenure at my current institution. Even if I were, why should someone else choose whether or not to compensate me for work published elsewhere? 

Additionally: my enthusiasm for open-source work might be seen as transferrable to writing. If, for example, innovation in engineering can best serve the public if it’s easily accessible to the public, regardless of income, should that also be true of writing? Of translation? 

This much is certain: if I demanded compensation for the writing I do, I would likely not receive it. See here for previous thoughts on the matter. 

Also: it’s 2013 already isn’t it?

——-

EDIT: This might be interesting, in light of my above-mentioned love for all things open-access (not all the points here are about free publication, but many are pertinent). 

DOUBLE EDIT: Why is Scalzi great? Because of Science Fiction, dogs, and Ohio.

    • #publishing
    • #Academic publishing
    • #economics
    • #writing
  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Public Service Announcement: the Humble e-Book Bundle

Many of you already know that humblebundle.com regularly bundles games by independent developers for sale at a price you name. Doing so allows buyers to decide how much a product is worth to them and how they want to divide their investment between game designers, distributers, and related charities. It’s a great way to be more engaged as a consumer, to support people who utilize alternative marketing practices, and to be more thoughtful about what it means to spend and consume in an online marketplace. 

Well! Humble bundling is not just for gamers anymore. There are two more days to buy the humble e-book bundle. You can purchase books by big authors who already support alternative publication models (Neil Gaiman, Cory Doctorow, etc.) and find some new names there also. 

Go buy books. Read using all your devices. Read all the time. 

    • #humble bundle
    • #e-books
    • #publishing
  • 6 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Publication Standards Pt. 1 - Nick Disabato

    • #publishing
    • #Higher Ed
  • 11 months ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

About

I'm a writer, translator, and teacher living in Richmond, Virginia and working at Virginia Commonwealth University.

Visit my homepage

Select from my research:
poetry
prison literacy

community development
translation
Slavic studies

textiles
teaching


or from other fun stuff:
classical studies

illustration

math

biology

nonsense biologies


Click here for free e-books.

  • @Phlogisticosh on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Questions?
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union